Uncategorized

Amazon Go the store without store owners

Hands up who never made a purchase on Amazon!!
No hand up? Everybody is looking away?
Calm down, we expected this. Every now and then all of us Internet users immerse ourselves into the great virtual stores looking for something that cannot be found, trendy or just intriguing. Even only to check the price, color, characteristics or the size.
It is only a small step from the searching to the purchasing, only a few clicks.
The Amazon package has become the symbol of Internet purchases, of something that attracts our interest and after a short waiting it reaches us. The virtual that becomes concrete, right at home.
When we talk about Amazon we talk about concreteness and much more. We get that from the statistics. The annual income, in little more than a decade, rose from 6.92 billion in 2004 to almost 136 billion dollars in 2016. The web shopping doesn’t know consumption crisis, on the contrary, with its endless range of products, often at a lower cost, represents an opportunity.

Longer we use the web, easier seems to be the online purchase; part of our lives.
Shopping online is not the only end point of this process of modernization.

The first Amazon store fully automated in Seattle, Amazon Go, is tracking a further new direction.

You must have activated the corresponding App on your own smartphone, then you enter the new store, you take what you want and exit. No registers, no line, no human touch. An automatic system is following you step by step tracking your operations, what you touch and what you take;  autonomy on movements, swiftness in purchasing, impersonality.

With Amazon Go there is not the Internet with its online stores to look like the real shops, quite the contrary. There is the real shop imitating and replicating the impersonal dynamics of the web. 

The online buying on smartphone application with login and password is instant, direct, anonymous, free of contradictions and human touch.

The first real shop Amazon Go, certainly the first of many, has something of virtual.  There is a “click” materializing.

It’s as if Facebook opened a restaurant where to socialize, obviously not in person but only through displays (maybe this is something that has been already done!).

It is also true that inside the shop there are salesmen, ready to answer to all the customer’s questions and necessities. Some tradition in a high-tech shop doesn’t hurt.

Amazon Go is the end point of a long process that transformed the commercial transaction, where the purchasing is aseptic and not to be shared with anyone.

amazon_go_shop

Using technologies in order to follow every customer’s movement with the aim of making him autonomous and free to purchase, has its nemesis in the trial, and we underline trial, the same that Amazon has conducted on its own employees with an electronic bracelet unable to track the activities and working rhythm.

We don’t want to fall in trivial speculations, but is rather evident that in both cases:

  • Web, communication and data are replacing partly the people (salesmen, cashiers and supervisors) and accelerate the action of purchasing or supervision.
  • Efficiency, immediacy and productivity are taking the center stage, relegating behind the stage the observation, the personal contact, the empathy and emotion.
  • The great freedom of movement offered by the shop technologies finds, through the same technologies, its oxymoron in the production chain, where every inappropriate movement may be evaluated.

Both dynamics are directed on the object and not on the person avoiding distractions.

As mentioned before, this is an attempt at bringing Internet into the real world by automating part of our lives. 

WorldTwoDotZero

 

Advertisements

Lonely window: Alone in front of the computer

Before the advent of internet the relation between man and computer was extremely personal. Turning on our computer meant, often, stop communicating and turn our back on others. Programming, the video games, the word processing were intimate moments, rarely shared unless in response to a final result. Who, in the ‘80s, used frequently a computer was often wittingly isolated from the rest of the world.

Perhaps today things are different: the computers are smaller, usable in a flash, in a click, allowing us “above all” to connect with other people, from anywhere in the world. Who “turns on” the computer today, quite often wants to interact with others.

We use the computer, especially in the smart version, not to “isolate us” but to “find us”, to share instantly our emotions, our daily life.

Yet, when we think about it, no matter how real may be the emotions arose online, the context in which grow is virtual, digital, synthetic.

Digital experience resets three of our main senses: the taste, the sense of smell and especially the touch and limits the use of the remainders, the sight and the hearing, not essential for communicating online. (Actually according to Wikipedia, our senses are precisely nine, but we don’t want to make this article more complex than it is).

Despite this, the digital experience is extremely rich in contents, images and videos; immediate, but lacking in contact. We are Avatar of ourselves.

A division process of the physical contact from the emotional one that redraws the spaces and the décor of our home that redefines the way of communicating, acting in the house, especially between different generations.

The television, at the center of our living room, is progressively losing, appeal and centrality. Now we look for a quiet corner, a table, a desk, a couch where we may comfortably sit with our computer increasingly lightweight, in search of something to be touched about.

Even the spotlights of our houses lose centrality, remaining in the background, subordinated to the central light provided by the display of our PC or smartphone or tablet; spots in our house where we isolate ourselves with the purpose to feel less lonely.

The beautiful photos taken by Julien Mauve, present in the “lonely window” gallery, make perfectly the idea of this change. Of how the essence of socialization, the fact of being together in the same place, looking at each other, touching each other, has diminished partly because of the spread of the distribution network in the event of a new and different relational model, open, participative, collaborative, social but also anonymous, mimetic, synthetic, solitary.

We are in front of our computer staring at the display, our mimicry changes very quick on the basis of the inputs coming from the net. We live a profound experience, immersive that excites us, but the other cyberusers are not with us, we are alone with a display. What we experience does not draw from the reality that surrounds us.

The internet owes its success to its own open space, always reachable, without filters, inhibitions, hierarchies but, at the same time like every sea change that concerns all of us and broaden our relational space, it takes a toll in reducing our sensorial experience.

That’s us, as Julien Mauve’s photos show, alone but together, connected without the possibility to hold our hands, in front of our display, of our “lonely window”.

 WorldTwoDotZero

Global Instagram Expo

old_photo

Instagram is without doubt the social network that has had the most evident growth trends in the last two years, whether in terms of use or real interest and presentation of original contents.

In this article we will explain you the reason of this growth, anything but casual.

Let’s start with analysing some numbers: a recent statistic, of August 2015, (source statista) shows the exceeding threshold of 300 million monthly active users. No doubt, an interesting number in absolute terms, but even more interesting if analysed in terms of increment. To do this, we rely on a second statistic (the same source statista) that shows as in March 2014 the number of active users was of 200 million and in February 2013 of 100 million. Basically every year (or so) the “social space” taken up by Instagram doubles its users.

How is this possible?

The first consideration is the same one underlined in a thousand other contexts, the smartphones spreading has changed the relation with internet, increasing the network use and the social tools, even several times over the day. In this case, for Instagram, we notice an extra reason: the mobile devices are endowed with camera. Taking photos and making videos have become a habit for many of us, photo (or video) that describe our day, multimedia items that we share with our friends, that help us to explain better some situations, that allow us “to bring online” part of our real world.

The first equation is therefore very simple: two billion smartphones sold, billion of potential photographers, three hundred million (for now) monthly active users on Instagram.

Thinking that the success of Instagram is exclusively related to some well-placed lens inside our mobile phone is however extremely reductive.

Instagram is simple, intuitive and represents one of the points of arrival of this process of extreme synopsis of concepts and language that is taking place online.

We may browse Instagram even from a mobile device; it has a strong visual impact, is multicoloured, multimedia and multilingual allowing its own projection to be exposed with no need to be explained. It is an expository global space consulted by tens of millions people every day (Milan Expo is a party for few intimate friends in comparison).

Instagram, same as Twitter, is further strengthened by the aggregative dynamics due to the use of hashtag and the possible interaction with the same Twitter.

Instagram is not just a personal space to fill in an original way and share with the other, but a possible showcase where art, history, culture, fashion, music, new tendencies and so on, may find the “right” attention. For a better perception of the large variety of contents present in this social network we consider appropriate to give you a few examples.

For instance, we recommend you to visit Cory Richards’ Instagram page, photographer, traveller, filmmaker who share his own travelling adventures; some photos are really beautiful… Instagram is the ideal space for documentary photographers, the fantastic images published by Benjamin Lowy and National Geographic are proof of this.

As mentioned above, on Instagram we find everything, from the fascinating romantic photos as those created by Arthur Elgort, fashion photographer, to the original space “seriousdesign”, from visionary to trash, that proposes objects “mixed” with food or the real “space” described by NASA, the Starbucks logos, the photos of a young rapper or photos of little dogs that on Internet, let’s face it, never miss. All examples that draw the attention of millions of followers, more exactly these first nine examples which we list, have till now, altogether, over 342 million followers.

No famous person can do without participating in this global showcase, singers such as Katy Perry or Madonna or, champions such as Usain Bolt or Serena Williams. Almost all the main protagonists of our time talk about themselves on Instagram.

Furthermore, we highlight, even if still a recent phenomenon and not yet widely spread, how Culture itself has decided to accept the challenge proposing its own beauties in a “social” way on Instagram. One example out of many is that of the Great Museum of the Duomo of Florence, that provides a “social space” all to be seen with beautiful photos of the Cathedral, the Dome, the Bell tower and so on.

Today Instagram is, for all intents and purposes, a huge global Expo which is able to feed its own personal (or institutional or commercial) popularity. But Instagram is also the image of society and tendencies of our times; it is transposition, the multimedia copy of the real world, the anthropological overview of the 21st century.

Moreover, from our point of view, the number of users still relatively low, even though fast-growing and the multimedia dimension that characterise Instagram have effect on the contents and descriptions, generally less banal compared to longest-running and popular Facebook until now at least in part.

As always, our advice is to be there and participate, do not remain a “network outsider”. Carpe diem and then share it online, through Instagram, create your best global expo!

WorldTwoDotZero

50 tips for an efficient Google searching

worldtwodotzeroAbout a year ago in the article entitled “Me, you, them, Google and the first three search results” we had carefully examined some data set that were monitoring search activities through Google. The results had proved to be, at least for us, amazing: approximately 90% of the users select, consequently a search, what they occur on page one. What is even more significant is the fact that approximately 63% of the users, therefore two out of three, select one of the first three occurrences on the list. The feeling that has emerged, during the data analysis, is that the list of Google search results has a conclusive effect on our choices. The list decides what we should select and not the other way around.
A year later, fully aware of the increasing spread of the Internet, especially among young people, we have decided to draw up an advice list, neither long nor short, fifty tips for the cybernaut who needs to find something through the most popular search engine in the world: Google.
The advices are not following a sequence, they require some reflection from the readers’ part, that, just like in the front of a list of Google search results, should carefully read and decide which of the multiple suggestions make it his own.

  1. There is no need to be hasty when searching contents on the Internet; you have to be patient in order to read carefully what is being proposed.
  2. Do not be satisfied with the first results on the list; the probability that those are what you need among the countless alternatives present on the Internet is statistically very low.
  3. Never mistake the most popular results for what really interests you.
  4. Do not be deceived by irrelevant images or contents nor by the key “I’m Feeling Lucky”, you have no reason to feel lucky during an Internet searching, just lump it!
  5. Do not get distracted by the Google prompter while you are typing the search terms.
  6. Do always check out at the beginning of the list if Google has re-interpreted your search using other terms, in this case Google introduces the message “Showing results for … “ and in smaller font on the next line it is given the possibility of doing the original search with “Search instead for… “. In the following example we are searching news regarding our imaginary friend Henry Potter, Google arbitrarily decides to turn our search into that of the Wizard protagonist of so many books. By only selecting “Search instead for…” we can do our initial search.
  7. Do pay the proper attention to “Search instead for…” of Google, maybe you have mistyped the terms and now you are browsing an unimportant set of information.
  8. If you have found something does not mean that you have correctly typed your terms, other thousand people could have made the same mistake; do check the mono field above before examining in depth the list of results.
  9. The web contains billion bits of information, but that does not mean that among those, it is the one you are looking for, even if it is very likely, do not despair.
  10. Do also deepen the pages subsequent to the first one, you may find interesting contents even in the two hundredth position, or over. Google does not know your real occurrences.
  11. To find what you are actually looking for may take time.
  12. First identify the correct search terms, write them on a Word document, Notepad or on a sheet of paper.
  13. If you have doubts about the meaning of a term type the key word “define”; for instance: define sociology. You will immediately get the definition from the Google’s dictionary. It is important to know the meaning Google assigns to that specific term.
  14. Use the terms found in the Google’s definition described in the preceding point in order to form alternative searches.
  15. Online you may easily find the suggestion in which the articles are considered useless while Google searching, and therefore be omitted. This information is partially false because if you search “the theory of everything”, “theory of everything” and “theory everything” you will get very different results. Our suggestion is to do the search with and without the articles so as to check the various alternatives proposed.
  16. Google treats equally Upper and Lowercase letters; you may type all in lowercase (or as you please).
  17. Do not conjugate the verbs; there is no friend of yours on the other side of the screen but a software procedure.
  18. Use direct terms and simple sentences with immediate effect.
  19. Don’t put your cup of tea near your computer while you are doing a search, if the tea spills, you can say goodbye to both your computer and your search.
  20. The punctual search: If the search concerns something of very specific, for instance name and last name of a person or the title of a book, use quotation marks before and after the terms. This way the search is done in an ad hoc basis on those terms and in that particular order.
  21. Using quotation marks while searching is particularly useful in case of quotations, for instance “to be or not to be”.
  22. Repeat the same search applying small variations to the terms.
  23. Use only some terms among those initially hypothesized, for instance combinations of two terms out of four. A broader search can offer interesting alternatives.
  24. Now add further terms without exceeding, of course. Remember that a very selective search can alienate the expected result.
  25. When possible try searching both singular and plural.
  26. When possible try searching both masculine and feminine.
  27. Reverse the terms order even more than once.
  28. Identify potential synonyms and repeat the search by varying one of the terms; all of you know that many dictionaries of synonyms and antonyms are available online, for instance the Virgilio’s words service.
  29. Do the same search by adding at the end or at the beginning the PDF term. This way you could find a document in standard format, printable that may reveal, even partly, the topic you need.
  30. Do the same search adding at the end the term thesis; by doing so, you could find a thesis that depict, even if partly, the argument of interest to you.
  31. Do the same search adding at the end the term youtube or video or lesson or e-learning; you may find some video material related to what you seek.
  32. Do not forget to repeat the search on the website of your library. If you don’t have one or more libraries of reference, type the term library followed by the name of your city. You will find a website that allows the search inside the library’s catalogue, normally through a mono field such as Google. Remember the public libraries lend books free of charge and, more and more often, they offer online digital material.
  33. If you are still looking for the nearest library (or pub or bar or fish market), you may type the terms: “find the nearest library” or “where is the nearest library”. The terms: “find” and “where is” combined with the term “nearest” activate the locator automatisms of Google elaborating a result list with the nearest libraries.
  34. Analogously as in the previous paragraph, you may type “weather” and automatically you will get on the result list the weather in your city.
  35. Google also proposes a search via images, by simply going to Google images. The most immediate way to use this service is to drag the image, for instance a file in jpeg or png or tiff format, in the mono field. It is possible to look for a photo, a digital cover of a book, a logo, a drawing and so on…
  36. Google also has “a books catalogue”. Go to the address of Google Books and repeat your search. We remind you however that before exploring the magic world of Google books, you should first do the already mentioned search mode on the website of your library because there you will find free contents and the possibility to be helped personally by the librarian, an expert in the field.
  37. Google also provides a specific search tool for academic contents and that is the Google Scholar.
  38. Try to do your search by adding the term Wikipedia. Wikipedia provides a further advantage, in certain cases at the end of the page it brings out some alternatives to be browsed: related items, bibliographies, notes, links,… other ways to reach the information you need.
  39. If the search is particularly complex, before starting you should open a word document and type every sequence of the terms you have searched, this way you will have a history of your attempts.
  40. On the same word document you can specify the most important links found by you and create a small bibliography-webography to report on your search.
  41. If you found nothing, do not hesitate to go back to square one and call into question your list terms; create a completely new one, like in the Goose game, sometimes is necessary to start from the beginning again.
  42. If you don’t find anything and you are tired of being connected to the Internet, ask your parents or your older sister or, better, go right to the library. You don’t even imagine how many things can be found in the real world with the help of a librarian.
  43. You can widen your search by using the operator OR. Practically you can run two or more searches at the same time separating every group of terms with OR; like this you will get a convergent list that correspond to both results.For instance, sociology OR psychology provides all the occurrences that include at least one of the terms.
  44. You can refine your search by using the operator “- “, in this case towards subtractive, the search sociology-psychology finds all the occurrences that contain the term sociology and certainly not the term psychology. Pay attention, the second term must be adjacent to “- “ in order to allow the subtractive action on the list. You must not include spaces between minus and the term “psychology”.
  45. The term “* “ gives you the possibility to run a wider search, for instance anthropolog* allows you to find occurrences with the terms Anthropolog, Anthropology, Anthropologist, …
  46. If you are a university student repeat your search by adding the name of your athenaeum.
  47. If you are a university student repeat your search by adding the name of your specialisation.
  48. If you are a university student repeat your search by adding the name of your professor, you may find some files or other interesting quotations.
  49. If you are Internet “experts”, during the selection try also to take a look at permalink; the presence of a plain domain and meaningful terms in the url are positive symptoms. Do avoid selecting inscrutable url made only by letters and numbers. To be clear, the url are the addresses in green placed below the title.
  50. Needless to say that knowing a second language such as  French, Spanish or Chinese represents a huge value-added. The main European languages along with the world’s most important languages enlarge the number of alternatives, more databases, more documents, more books, more quotations and so on.

As a matter of fact, these rules go far beyond the Internet, regardless of the tools used, real or virtual, each study or close examination requires care, patience, sorting capacity and comparative ability and luck has nothing to do with it.

A final tip, do not slavishly copy everything you found. For two reasons: because it is important to understand what is all about and it is only fair to write by your own hand what you want to tell, because as already explained under the point no.20 and no.21 above, if your professor takes one of your sentences and puts it in quotations marks on the Internet and tracks it down through Google and finds that identical quote in the thesis or in the search of another person, you are in big trouble.

WorldTwoDotZero

The digital Omnivores: A new model of mass consumption

1829-47184

The consumer society, or rather consumerist, underwent a significant change during the last decade.
On the one hand, the modern productive model has reached physiological limits producing more than necessary, in terms of consumption and desire, and on the other hand the serious public debt of many industrialized countries, among these Italy, has determined the application of strict policies on the deficit which have led to a drop in consumptions and, consequently, to a decline of the manufacturing processes.
This state of crisis has originated, in one part of the consumers, the beginning of a critique conscience which determined a greater ability in selecting and identifying the own necessities, for a critical and aware consumption. The others, perhaps the majority, are getting used to it and begin to buy less and worry more about the future.
In this sad passage from the postmodern society to a new model of social consumption, internet – “the web”, is determining a further significant “rift.”
On internet the consumer doesn’t play only the role of a passive spectator as happens in the real world: he chooses, makes comments, shares, read other people’s judgments, communicates, compares the prices, passes the word in a fast way,… practically he is the protagonist of his own purchase. Through internet the consumer has at his disposal a remarkable number of alternatives and a great deal of opinions and information which accompany every choice he made.
Furthermore, web spreads, online as well as in the real world, a new model of purchase based on the use of goods or services and not on the possession, going far beyond the “old system” which had dominated before the rural society and after the industrial/modern/postmodern one.
I, as a user, read the comments of the others and consequently choose the movie to see this evening. Therefore, I am aware of my choice made, let’s say, through a service “on demand” among thousands of titles available. At the end of the vision I don’t retain any right on this film (if not, in some occasions, for a short period of time).
The passive spectator/reader/listener/client becomes an active user who chooses, judges, spreads information and who, at the same time, through services online or on demand or streaming, listens to the music, reads a book, watches a documentary, a film, a TV series.
The novelties are uncountable, the user is aware of the fact that the services are provided in real time without being necessary to reach a particular place to proceed with the purchase and, above all, the patrimony is replaced by the immediate and to term usufruct, not to mention the quantity of the goods available, practically endless.
Today, in this epoch “of transit”, often, for the people who don’t know me in person, I still am what I possess. By the end of the next decade, for those who won’t know me in person, I will be what I will purchase online, what I use, what I reach and what I share /comment.
The option of term purchase, typical of intangible services “on line“, “on demand“, “streaming“, “in cloud“, adopts the main characteristics of web: it is fast, participatory, social, it doesn’t require personal contact, it is delocalized, it can be anonymous. All characteristics amply deepened in the previous articles dedicated to the “new web 2.0.”
To sum up, “I choose what to purchase and when to proceed with it, I don’t stock, I don’t possess, I don’t preserve more than I need.”
The new digital devices, especially the tablets, are the real protagonists of this change. They are determining the global spread of this new model of mass consumption.
The tablets are more “friendly” than the Personal Computers: they are easy to turn on, easy to turn off, in an instant they allow you to access the services without using a desk, they have a good autonomy, they are able to memorize your own passwords accessing both internet, through a browser, and APP, or better, applications expressly saved.
The tablets are not the only type of available tools, a wide range of mobile devices, each of it characterized by specific characteristics (dimensions, weight, video, price), allows each of us to be frequently connected online.
The study made by Deloitte named “State of the Media Democracy” underlines the increasing purchase and use of tablets, despite the economic crisis, paying particular attention to the other devices as well, such as “Laptop” and “smart phone”, also very popular .
The previous model of consumption is in full crisis, everyday thousands of shops close, the consumers don’t buy anymore and they even lose interest in buying, yet, as Deloitte’s study indicates, the consumption crisis doesn’t concern at all the mobile devices with the internet access, which, by the way, is in very fast growth in Italy in 2014 as well. Along with this, increases the number of people able to navigate from a device to another (tablet, smart phone, PC) depending on the situations, which strengthens even more the initial hypothesis and that is the one of the user who is becoming more and more expert and aware of what internet means.
The infographic proposed in this study sustains that 44% of Italians possess one of the followings: a laptop, a tablet or a smart phone, fact that gives him/her the possibility to be connected to internet all day long, in a targeted manner, based on the personal needs of each individual.
Deloitte goes further coining the term of “Digital omnivores” with the purpose of identifying that typology of users who are often connected to internet, hungry of contents, information, social contacts and so on…
To summarize, once again web, through its “smart” tools, positions itself in areas where the “real world” turns out insufficient. The user not only has a smaller economic availability but also a shorter time available and therefore he uses more (online) tools to search for opinions, to compare the prices, to choose, to suggest, to buy in a down market even by means of new contractual forms.
The “old style” consumers are decreasing and the “digital omnivores” are increasing. They are fast, comparative, schizophrenic, never completely satisfied, with a strong tendency towards saving and free on line.
The all while the previous social model, based on the consumption on the spot and the physical possession of the goods, has evidently overcome its peak only to follow a steep descent whose distribution seems to adopt an all-Gaussian tendency.
What if the GNP, the gross national product, will be calculated in the future through the number of online transactions made by its citizens? The statistics of Google Analytics on our transactions would govern our deficit and our spread.
Maybe there is a reason to be concerned about or maybe not.

WorldTwoDotZero